Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Study Confirms Benefit For Chronic Migraine Patients

St. Jude Medical, Inc. (NYSE:STJ), a global medical device company, has announced publication of results from the first large-scale study of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the occipital nerves in patients suffering from chronic migraine. The study results, published online by Cephalalgia the journal of the International Headache Society, show a significant reduction in pain, headache days and migraine-related disability.


Conducted at 15 medical centers in the U.S., the study followed 157 participants who, on average, suffered from headache approximately 21 days per month. At 12 weeks, patients receiving PNS therapy reported an average of six fewer headache days a month.


Additional key findings at 12 weeks were as follows:

 
  • 43 percent improvement in overall disability scores, as measured using the Migraine Disability 
  • Assessment questionnaire (MIDAS)
  • 53 percent of the patients ranked their relief as excellent or good
  • Patients reported a 42 percent improvement in pain relief
"One of the primary reasons that patients seek therapy is to try to find a way to lessen the number of days they experience migraine," said Stephen D. Silberstein, M.D., past president of the American Headache Society, director of the Jefferson Headache Center, and the principal investigator in the study. "For the millions who suffer from chronic migraine, these study results are important, as they confirm that peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) of the occipital nerve may help improve their quality of life and lessen the number of days per month they suffer with this debilitating condition."

PNS therapy for this condition involves the delivery of mild electrical pulses to the occipital nerves that are located just beneath the skin at the back of the head. A small electrical lead or leads are placed under the skin and connected to a neurostimulator, which produces pulses of stimulation.

In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, participants were implanted with the St. Jude Medical Genesis™ neurostimulator and randomly assigned to an active or control group for 12 weeks. The active group received stimulation immediately upon implantation, while patients in the control group did not receive stimulation until after the first 12 weeks. Both the investigators and the patients were blinded to treatment.

Although statistical significance was demonstrated across most measures, it was not observed for the primary endpoint (defined as the difference in the percentage of patients in the active group versus control who achieved 50 percent or greater pain reduction at 12 weeks). However, patients in the active group were more likely than control patients to experience 30 percent or greater pain reduction, which is considered clinically meaningful.

"When this study was initially designed, the primary endpoint was based on a reduction in pain, which at the time was the standard measurement for neurostimulation studies," said, Dr. Mark Carlson, chief medical officer and senior vice president of research and clinical affairs for the St. Jude Medical Implantable Electronic Systems Division. "However during the course of the study, many neurologists began to recognize reduction in the number of headache days as a more significant improvement in patient quality of life than the measurement of pain reduction alone."

The most common adverse event was persistent pain and/or numbness at the implant site, followed by lead migration. The majority of adverse events were classified as mild or moderate in severity.

Preliminary data from this study was presented at the International Headache Congress (IHC) in 2011. The Genesis neurostimulation system used in this study is approved in Europe and Australia for the management of the pain and disability associated with intractable chronic migraine.

About Chronic Migraine

Chronic migraine is a disabling neurological disorder that can last for hours or days at a time. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.7 to 4 percent of adults have headache on more than 15 days per month. Compared with people who periodically experience migraine headache, individuals with chronic migraine experience significantly greater disability, economic burden, and impairments in health-related quality of life. According to the European Journal of Neurology the total annual cost attributed to migraine amounts to €111 billion in the EU. 


Source

Back Pain? Steroid Shots May Raise Fracture Risk


Steroid injections to the spine were widely considered to be safe before being linked to an outbreak of fungal meningitis that by mid-week had killed 24 people in 17 states.

But a study out today raises new concerns about the injections that are used to treat millions of back pain sufferers every year -- and it has nothing to do with the tainted steroids blamed for the meningitis outbreak.

Spine Injections May Raise Fracture Risk


Epidural steroid shots are injected into the space around the spinal cord. The steroid works to curb inflammation in the area, leading to pain relief.

The study suggests that epidural shots increase the risk of spinal bone fractures, and researchers say patients with bone loss should be warned about this risk.

The research was presented today in Dallas at the annual meeting of the North American Spine Society.
Bone fractures of the spine are the most common fractures in patients with osteoporosis.

According to the American College of Rheumatology, one in two women over 50 and one in six men will suffer a fracture related to osteoporosis.

"For a patient population already at risk for bone fractures, steroid injections carry a greater risk than previously thought," says researcher Shalom Mandel, MD, of Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit.

While other steroid treatments, such as those taken orally or by IV, have long been linked to bone loss, epidural steroid shots are thought to have little impact on bones because they are delivered directly to the problem area and believed to have less effect on the rest of the body.

But Mandel says this may not be the case.

"If epidural steroids are causing fractures, it is probably because the treatment is not localized," he says. "The drug may be entering the circulatory system."

More Study Needed, Doctor Says


The Henry Ford Hospital researchers examined data on 6,000 patients treated for back pain between 2007 and 2010.

Half the patients were treated with at least one epidural steroid shot and the other half had never had the treatment.

According to the analysis, spinal fracture risk increased by 29% with each steroid shot. This was an association though, and does not prove cause and effect.
Mandel still uses epidural steroid shots to treat patients with back pain, and he says he has even had the injections himself.
"They were very helpful," he says. "There is definitely a place for this treatment."

But he adds that patients at risk for fractures should be warned about the risk and followed closely if they have the treatment.

Orthopaedic surgeon Neil S. Ross, MD, of Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, who reviewed the research, says the study does not convince him that epidural spinal shots increase fracture risk.
While he does not give the shots, Ross says he has referred many patients to doctors who do.
"I would not change my recommendations about this treatment based on this study," he says, adding that more study is needed to confirm the findings.


Source